Article written by

16 comments
ariess
ariess

The article seems to me, to be a good reason for Freddie Sanchez. 

Chris Quick
Chris Quick moderator

 @ariess If he'll take a minor league deal, I'd go for it. 

ariess
ariess

 @Chris Quick  @ariess Me too.  Out of all these guys how many have won a batting title. And, the guy is a baby compared to Marco Scutaro. 

T in Chico
T in Chico

 @ariess Freddy Sanchez?!?!  No way you can seriously consider him an option after the last two years of his frail body doing nothing but rehab that would take a normal athlete 6 months to recover from. He has never been reliable and will probably be forced to this year. No one wants a broken down slap hitting 2nd baseman that is on his last leg. Freddy did his part in 2010 but got over on the Giants by resigning just like Huff. It's usually best to leave old girlfriends in the past than to call them up late when you've had too much to drink, you always remember the next day why you aren't together any longer. That would be the case with ole fragile Fred.

ariess
ariess

 @T in Chico  @ariess  That is almost my point.  As broken down as Freddie Sanchez is, and he may or may not be able to play, these options are so bad, that they make Freddie seem good by comparison.  My definition of signing a broken down player is Mark Derosa.  The giants paid Huff a ton of money to suck. If they did give Freddie a chance it would have to be for a pile of dirt around the batters box, and a promise to take a look at what he could do.  Its like in Fromme's book about a half century ago, "Escape From Freedom"  its not just about replacing someone, its about replacing someone with someone better.   Unfortunately Theriot is looking to be a starter somewhere and not just a back-up.  

T in Chico
T in Chico

 @ariess Why pay Theriot or Sanchez the veteran minimum to suck when you can have the same guy on a minor league contract? Theriot at least can get on the field where Sanchez hasn't been in forever. Freddy hasn't played more than 111games since 2008. He is 35 now, I don't see any plus side to adding him to the roster at all. DeRosa, what thief, why do teams pay a guy with zero pop and a wrist that could fall off at anytime? If he is such a good clubhouse influence then make him a coach but don't put a worthless player on the 25 man roster to be a cheerleader.

TSF
TSF

The Giants badly want Abreu to succeed and my bet is on him making the club out of ST. Abreu fits into the same toolsy, former prospect mold that Arias and Blanco emerged from, and it would reflect well on the organization to show they have an eye for such players. Tanaka has also offered to go to Fresno if he doesn't make the roster and that is immediately appealing to test his NPB bat against MiLB pitching, and reduces pressure on the Giants to add him to camp. Certainly, Tanaka has made a good impression with his personality and defense, but the smart move is definitely test before trust.

T in Chico
T in Chico

@TSF Tanaka would be an early season storyline for the team to run with besides the Championship of course.

saarey
saarey

Well, at least we don't have Velez or Burriss on the list...

T in Chico
T in Chico

@saarey You make an excellent point. Those two were probably the worst two major league players i've ever watched. Burriss was good and nothing and Velez flat out didn't know the game.

ariess
ariess

 @T in Chico  @saarey I am surprised that with all the coaching, Burriss could never figure out how to drive the ball. Neither could he be a gap hitter from the right side nor left.   He came out of college as a decent prospect, but had more problems hitting more than singles than anyone I can remember.  You would think with this speed he could hit an occasional double.  He had his chance, maybe Dusty and Reds saw something in him.  Best of luck to him, except when he plays the giants.  That is, assuming he makes the majors. 

 

T in Chico
T in Chico

 @ariess  @saarey Burriss was the only guy I can remember having the same AVG, SLG, and OBP. He was a singles hitter who batted in the low .200's that didn't draw walks. His speed was always a nonfactor because of his inability to get on base. The Giants gave him too many chances in my opinion, kind of like Fred Lewis, you can't polish a turd.

T in Chico
T in Chico

It used to be that the WAR stat and others like it were stupidly overlooked, now they are emphasized entirely too much. It is a useful tool but by no means should it be the end all be all that people are using to determine a playes worth. You still have to use the eye with the stats to determine if a player is worth a shit. Watching a player like Bredan Ryan come into a no-hitter cold in the 9th last year and make a tough run through play reminds you that stats can't show everything. That being said, some numbers you can't over look and Valdez is a certified turd. I have no idea why this guy would get signed let alone invited to ST. I say it has to be Tanaka's job to piss on or give the home grown Noonan his one shot at proving his worth. Valdez and Abreu can kick rocks as they are a dime a dozen in the minors.

glib
glib like.author.displayName 1 Like

I think that slot is Tanaka's to lose. Then again, this is the year that Arias gets more than 350 AB.

T in Chico
T in Chico

Well Tanaka isn't doing himself any favors by starting 0-9 and making throwing errors on routine plays. I wonder if its just a case of tight butthole or if he will always be over matched by MLB pitching. I know its too early to tell but when you are trying to steal a spot on an already full roster, you need to make yourself standout and not the way he is doing it.