Article written by

6 comments
nvsfg
nvsfg

Excellent work as usual Baron...err Chris !

Al
Al

He didn't say 'grit' once, I'm upset.

ChrisSherwood
ChrisSherwood

Really enjoyed this interview; a few of these answers seem like token responses at face value, but Skeels seems to have a lot of conviction about what he's doing – especially the comments re: repeating a level – and seems to like the mix of players he's got. The apparent attention to detail is a big plus in my book.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Great post, but where are the stupid GIFs?

RogerM
RogerM

Nice job, Chris.  Thanks for this.  Can't agree more with Andy's indignation at the repeating levels question.  I did a survey recently that caused me to look through the minor league records of literally thousands of players and my single biggest takeaway was how often really good major leaguers had repeated low levels, even multiple times or on occasion even thru demotions and repeats.  There is a ticking clock to the degree that you want them to be in position to take advantage of their peak physical years at the major league level, but the routes that players can take for things to click in are varied and sometimes byzantine.

 

Also, I like a lot of the things he had to say here about developing both hitters and pitchers.  Getting a sense of what players' strengths are in terms of the strike zone is huge.  And giving kids innings without roles? Awesome.  I really believe that Andy has a future in the big leagues and I really hope that the Giants help promote him within the industry for that, if they don't take advantage of it themselves.  He's a plus prospect in his own right, I think.