Article written by

7 comments
Damon
Damon

Fangraphs had Crawford at 0.5 WAR last season over 66 games, despite his utterly atrocious wOBA of 0.259. I don't think it's possible for him to be much worse at the plate than that considering his walk skills, so unless his defense all of a sudden falls of a cliff I feel safe enough that he will not post a negative WAR. Burris, on the other hand, apparently has a CAREER WAR of 0.1 over 221 games, including negative value in both 2009 and 2011. Basically, his career offensive numbers are all as bad as or worse than Crawford's 2011, and he has below-average defense. I can't understand how he's even part of the conversation.

Ken Cupples
Ken Cupples

While I'm not as excited about the potential of Burriss improving (or avoiding regression), why does no one give Crawford even the slightest glimmer of hope for improvement? With all the Fontenot/Theriot love on the message boards and posts, why isn't there a constant vigil to replace Crawford for either one of them if Crawford is so terrible? The thought of seeing Whiteside/Stewart at C and anyone other than Crawford at SS makes me want to turn my television off faster than if Jonathan Sanchez was the scheduled starter. At least if Crawford isn't the answer, we'll find out by playing him.....and then we can move on to putting up a link to a webcam of Joe Panik's at-bats this season.

oldjacket
oldjacket

I'll admit to liking Crawford more than most: I think he can be a 1-1.5 win player. But I would still feel better with Crawford as Plan B With Some Upside, as opposed to a Plan A With A Lot Of Risk.

Lyle
Lyle

I think the clear lesson to be learned from your list is that we should never, ever employ an infielder named Cabrera or Gonzalez. I'm not at all concerned about Crawford - I expect much less, offensively, from shortstop, and I believe Crawford will easily meet my expectations. 2B is an entirely different matter, and Burriss is a big concern. I'd much rather give those AB's to Fontenot, TBH, and I'm not really a fan of his.

rog61
rog61

I have to say I'm somewhat amazed that the 2008 Giants didn't manage to make that list, what with the Bocock/Burriss/evil Vizquel troika manning SS. I know Durham had a very good offensive season that year, but he was gone halfway thru and I don't even remember who replaced him at 2b. Burriss I guess. Anyway, so the whole mess was better than 0.4 WAR, huh? Who knew?

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

FYI: Giants 2B in 2008 were worth a collective 3.0 WAR. Giants SS were worth a collective -0.8 WAR (2nd worst mark in the majors, but not as bad as Baltimore's -3.6 that year). The 2008 SS group combined for a 49 wRC+ and featured such greats as Ivan Ochoa and Brian Bocock!