Freddy love, injury worries « Bay City Ball – A Giants Blog

Freddy love, injury worries

Here’s the deal: I really have enjoyed watching Freddy Sanchez play as a Giant.

That might sound a tad bit weird, but it’s true. Freddy Sanchez has been, for the most part, what I like to term a “Good Giant”. He seems like a likeable guy, he’s been a decent player for the Giants, and he was on the field in 2010 when the Giants won the World Series. Those things combined will always endear Freddy Sanchez to me. This isn’t rocket algebra.

And yet, there’s a part of me that’s kind of concerned about Giants second basemen next season.

I’ll break it down in two easy-to-read bullet points.

  • Freddy Sanchez gets hurt a lot.
  • Mike Fontenot and Emmanuel Burris are a single sproing away from a full-time gig.

This, being Bay City Ball, here’s a simple graph that depicts Freddy Sanchez’s plate appearances by baseball age.

We know that second basemen, as a historical player-group, don’t age well. By their mid-30s they tend to be old, broken, and ineffective. Freddy Sanchez will be 34-years-old in 2012. Back to the graph, take notice of that nasty red line … it’s going down, down, down.

The magical ZiPS computer has Freddy Sanchez at an 87 OPS+ — meaning that he’s projected to hit 13 percent below league average. That’s about ten points off Sanchez’s career OPS+. Not terrible production, and if you factor in Sanchez’s age with his player-group it seems quite reasonable. If you assume that Sanchez is playing his usual above-average defense, it’s a line you can live with.

I’m fully aware that January is kind of early to worry about this stuff, but this latest quote on Sanchez from the Giants’ motherpage has me a little concerned.

“I want to and I feel like I’ll be able to [play in exhibitions],” said Sanchez, who participated in a Giants strength and conditioning camp here last month and intends to take part in another one in a couple of weeks. “But at the same time, I’ll go by what the trainers want. I want to be smart.”

Freddy may or may not be ready to play in exhibition baseball this coming spring. Gulp.

It’s a gulp-worthy statement because while I like Mike Fontenot as much as the next guy, he’s going to be stretched as a full-time starter; and, everything else (scouting, statistics, small children) tells us that Emmanuel Burriss is terrible at baseball. So, for the Giants, Freddy Sanchez’s health will be a major topic in 2012. I think if the Giants can get 120 games out of him they’ll consider it a victory.

A little bit of crowd-sourcing before I end this post: How many plate appearances will Freddy Sanchez get in 2012?

How many PAs for Freddy Sanchez in 2012?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
Post comment as twitter logo facebook logo
Sort: Newest | Oldest

I take a different tact on this. In the last couple of years Freddy has tried to use rest and rehab to solve his physical wows, I believe last years surgery will allow him to physically and psychologically push himself closer to his 2010 numbers. Just my opinion and hopes.

No worries. Plugging Mike Fontenot in for Freddy Sanchez will not be that big of a drop off. Here's the dark horse: Conor Gillaspie. Give him some reps at 2nd in AAA and let's see how he fills in if Freddy goes down for good. We might get to see Joe Panik as early as next season as well.

If Freddy gets in 110 games this year and is productive it will be a miracle. Great guy, plays hard, just won't be healthy this year . . .or the next. He has had more shoulder surgeries than a stripper with breast implants gets. Watching Burris will be like pulling teeth without the' juice'.

It sort of looks like a Batmobile!

Would be interested to see that same graph, overlaid with average 2b vs. Freddy. I get that he's injury-prone, but does he age significantly worse than the average 2b?

Calendar

January 2012
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archives