Article written by

Baseball writer... sort of.

29 comments
DyehardFan
DyehardFan

That was amazing. I was afraid of the read at first because of its length, but it was well worth it. "P.S. Don’t you guys have scouting reports that tell you which hand the opposing pitcher throws with? Oh well." Great voice throughout.

Paapfly
Paapfly

Excellent. I'm glad you enjoyed it.

marc
marc

Awesome post. Unfortunately, Huff is also maturing - except that's also called "the decline phase". Belt should be playing more.

Giants1982
Giants1982

Huff may not win the NL batting title this year, but he's on pace to win the Giants batting title. Near the top in batting average, leader in RBI and hits, and one behind Panda in HRs. Couple that with a great clubhouse personality, leadership, and maturity, and I feel like he's a cash cow we have to squeeze as much as we can out of over the next two seasons. Ease Brandon Belt in as Bochy has been doing. He'll get his time. For our offense-challenged Giants, Huff is a 3-4-5 batter. That double last night with two outs for our second run was huge. He comes through when needed. My two cents...

Giants1991
Giants1991

Yes, Huff is technically leading the giants in batting average with a .239 average but that is only because he is the only one qualified for the batting title. Sandoval has played in 40 fewer games and yet only has 19 fewer hits in over 150 fewer ABs and is beating him in HR. So no Huff is not on pace to win the giants batting title and the only possible way he will win it is if no one else qualifies. It isn't that impressive to be number 1 out of 1.

Alex
Alex

Yeah, .239/.296/.364 is NOT what I want out of my 3-4-5 hitter, not even for my 8th hitter. and NOT what I want out of the best offensive position in 1B. Last thing, RBI is a terrible stat and anyone hitting 4th or 5th can rack up RBI just by hitting there. Belt is .232/ .338/.348 which isnt much better, but it is better and he has done much better of late.

Chapinator
Chapinator

RBI is a terrible stat? The giants don't get a lot of hits but every time we win its because a couple of guys step up and do whatever it takes to get a run in. RBI is as important a stat as any, especially when were talking about the Giants and all you need is 1-4 runs to win a ballgame.

GiantTorture
GiantTorture

Finally, this site has gone mainstream. Wow, just wow. RBI is not at all an important stat because the variables involved in whether a player gets an RBI have little to do with the player. For example batting behind Barry Bonds who once had an OBP of over .600 is going to produce a lot more opportunities to drive in runs than batting behind Shawon Dunston who once had an OBP below .300. A player could hit .200 behind Bonds and drive in more runs then a guy who hit .350 behind Dunston. There's probably a better explanation than that, but yes, RBI is the worst stat there is next to the Win.

snafu
snafu

This situation makes me think of a comment made by Terry Francona in a piece on Grantland: "But it's about more than numbers," [Francona] says. "I remember a few years ago, we're playing the Yankees on national TV and one of the kids in baseball ops — he's not here now — says to me about five hours before the game, 'You got Mike Lowell in the lineup?' And I say, 'Yeah.' And he says he doesn't do well in the matchup with Chien-Ming Wang, who was pitching for the Yankees. "I say to the kid, 'So you don't want me to play him?' And he says, 'Yeah' and I tell him, 'OK. Look over there. There's Mikey Lowell's locker. He's over there. You go tell Mikey Lowell he's not playing in a national TV game against our biggest rival 'cause your fucking numbers tell us not to play him. See what kind of reaction you get from him and then come back and tell me.' Course Mikey Lowell played that game." Huff is such an outspoken personality and presence in that clubhouse that maybe there is a fear of disrupting the locker room chemistry and camaraderie by favoring Belt over Huff even though the statistical evidence is starting to become overwhelming. As someone who has never played on a professional sports team (surprise!), I don't know how much that sort of thing impacts performance or morale. Honestly, Huff is probably going to have to drop off a cliff in terms of production to the point where if Bochy were to start Belt on a regular basis it would not ruffle any feathers (something he seems keen on avoiding). I am very much in favor of seeing Belt start on a regular basis, but I think fans and bloggers often don't do justice to the complexity of the situation since we can only assess the on-field production and are not surrounded by these players on a regular basis.

Rory Paap
Rory Paap

I see your point, and it's a good point. Thanks for the comment. I also think, though, that there's a bit of a difference from a guy playing in what is perceived to be a bad matchup for him (one game) then a guy who has been playing every day and has been bad for a year, beyond horrendous for four months. And I may be wrong, but I'll submit he can have just as much of an impact, chemistry-wise, while sitting on the bench. Who knows really. I just don't buy it. Finally, from a comfortability standpoint, if Bochy can't sit Huff down and tell him he's moving in Belt because he's not producing (*at all*), what the hell are the Giants paying him for?

Chapinator
Chapinator

I love you Paap, but if Huff turns it around these articles are going to look pretty stupid. Belt is still maturing and we are in a pennant race as well as a championship defense. Huff has been there and also is a pretty important guy in the clubhouse. Plus, the Giants aren't really doing too shabby in my opinion (just got beltran, pitching heating up like last year, 4th best record in the Majors AND we still got Philly's number).

Rory Paap
Rory Paap

Thanks for the "love," Chap. I'm very okay with looking stupid if Huff turns it around. After all, that'll mean good things for the Giants, which is all that I want. Also, I wouldn't be much of a writer if I wasn't willing to express my opinion for fear of looking stupid. As far as Belt maturing, I don't see how he's doing that as playing Ishikawa's role. I don't see how sitting Huff should prevent him from being a strong figure in the clubhouse -- it'd be on him if it did. And I definitely agree they aren't looking too shabby.

GiantTorture
GiantTorture

Agreed. And the biggest thing to me is, what's there to lose? It's not like Belt could do much worse. Also, if Belt can develop in the Ishikawa role, why can't Huff break out of his funk in the same role? Any way you slice it, there's almost no reason not to give Belt a look.

RegrettableHulk
RegrettableHulk

Brilliant. Couldn't agree more. And If you'r going to start Huff, dont bat him 4th or 5th.

Kellin
Kellin

One day outta five, he should hit ninth! At this point I've got as much confidence in Bumgarner's swing as I do Huff's. The "Mr. 4-3" nickname is the most appropriate nickname I've heard in a long time.

Ali
Ali

This was awesomesauce.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Very funny, I was waiting for "Brooks was here"

Rory Paap
Rory Paap

Brooks was awesome. So, my fiancé... She doesn't love this movie. Break it off?

Sam
Sam

Over the past 5 games hes played in huff has an obp of .473 so he may be turning it around. However I don't believe he should be hitting clean up

Paapfly
Paapfly

Ya, maybe. But it's the 100 before that which have me concerned.

Sam
Sam

Totally feel you there, obp over last 6 up to .478 after todays game, lets hope he keeps this up also hes been on base 6 nights in a row which is a good sign.

GiantTorture
GiantTorture

Sarcastic ass? Apparently my reputation precedes me. In fact I'd like to request a graph be made by one Chris Quick on my sarcastic assyness. It's all good though, just joking with you. Didn't mean to offend.

Sam
Sam

Wow spelling problems "the entire season his obp is terrible******"

Sam
Sam

Never said it meant anything just saying maybe its a good sign.. of course if you would look at the entire system is obp is terrible. I'm just saying its improving. Now you can be a sarcastic ass and think your being clever, or you can just take the comment for what its worth. Highlighting a 6 game stretch where he has been much better than he has the entire season.

GiantTorture
GiantTorture

I'd go ahead and continue reading this site, but in the meantime, go ahead and google "small sample size" and read up. I'm sure you're a super smart guy just like Brian and Bruce so you'll have no problem figuring it out, but it might be some good reading. I read here that 6 games doesn't really mean anything and is just something called "noise" whatever that means (maybe it's really loud at those games?).

obsessivegiantscompulsive
obsessivegiantscompulsive

I had to cut my comment in half: I assume their hope is that he has been trying too hard in the face of the loss of the performance of Posey, Burrell, and Franchez. With Beltran now being the top dog, maybe he will loosen up and start hitting like he did last season. I think if he doesn't start hitting soon, the Giants will start playing Belt more, particularly if he can hit like he did in the other game. He will need to earn his way into the starting position in the majors, and what he has done so far in the majors does not scream "starter". He will either have to be patient or start hitting when he gets his chances, that would get Bochy's attention fast.

obsessivegiantscompulsive
obsessivegiantscompulsive

There's how good Belt will be eventually and how good he is now. I feel pretty good that all the accolades he has gotten will come to fruition. Eventually. Now, he can't control his strikeout rate very well in AAA and has been just as bad in the majors. That has been Ishikawa's problem too, striking out too much. He is not going to do much in the majors striking out so much. Now, if he had been hitting better in the majors, that is one thing, but he hasn't. Meanwhile, Huff's rope is pretty much gone now, and he has hit .263/.326/.368/.694 since the ASG. I think the Giants will give Huff one more chance to turn things around - when a hitter has hit like he did in 2010 and 2008, you should give him the chance to figure things out.