Article written by

21 comments
Liem
Liem

He's a switch hitter... It's time to field the all ambidextrous team!

marcellosfg
marcellosfg

A weird decision. I would have rather seen Max Ramirez come up and let Sanchez continue to develop in the minors. Sanchez's line in Fresno, while much better in the K/BB department, is still subpar. I don't see him providing much support to the offense. Also, 3 catchers. That's typically NOT the way to improve your offense.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Yeah, Ramirez would have made sense.

oldjacket
oldjacket

it is a bit weird, especially if they are mainly calling him up to be a pinch hittter. I'm obviously a Hector Sanchez booster, but I'd be pretty surprised if he were ready. Still, I'm excited to see him play.

BruxB
BruxB

At the end there I assume you mean Disabled List as opposed to Designated List? So does this mean we now have three catchers on the active roster? That seems like a lot of pine to waste unless Hector is going to be the go to pinch hitter.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Fixed. Thanks for the correction. Yeah, three catchers for now. I think.

AVE_fan
AVE_fan

"The Whiteside-Stewart bar is pretty low to clear, let’s hope Sanchez can clear it." Huhhh???? Whiteside and Stewart are on different planets, ability wise, so let's be clear which one you're talking about. Whiteside not only has been stellar behind the plate in THINGS THAT MATTER--like keeping the other team from scoring--his hitting is MUCH better (and improving with regular play). Be careful what you *hope* for. Often, it's far better to *leave well-enough alone*.

LeviDavis
LeviDavis

Trying to figure out if this guy is serious.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Whiteside has been hitting better lately, but he's still *Eli Whiteside*

AVE_fan
AVE_fan

...and youre still *Chris quick*...what of it??

ian
ian

luckily computers don't have feelings

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

This is starting to remind me of the Josh Banks guy.

ian
ian

lolwut

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Hey Ian, did you ever see Sanchez in San Jose? Tell me something scouty about him.

michael
michael

it doesn't matter what standard you apply to him; he's not out of shape.

LeviDavis
LeviDavis

It might be a mistake to apply normal body standards to professional athletes. You know, people who get paid to keep their bodies in shape.

michael
michael

bad body? he's thick below the waist, but he's built very well above. I honestly don't know why anyone would call him fat or say he has a bad body. If that's fat, then we're all obese

ian
ian

Sure, saw him a few times. Big boy, bad body. Plus power potential for sure. Saw him go yard thrice in Stockton against a coupla different pitchers when he was DHing once, that was pretty sweet. Not a great receiver, but has an average/above-average arm. I'm hopeful that he's an easy offensive upgrade over the Stew-side platoon, and if he 's improved his receiving/game-calling, that's lagniappe.

oldjacket
oldjacket

/pats self on back

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Good work! I was just reviewing our emails on the prospect list and I didn't have Sanchez in my original top 15. You lobbied for him and I ended up giving in.