Article written by

Baseball writer... sort of.

3 comments
blandwilson
blandwilson

As complement to Mr. Brisbee's "rant" (which I wholly endorse), I'd like to add the following: I've noticed a lot of posters making the "It's always been that way..." type argument on Andrew Baggarly's blog (for example). One went so far as to say that way distinguishes baseball from other sports is that it "stays true to its rules." Whatever was meant by that, it clearly entails the claim that baseball rules don't change. But the view that baseball itself is somehow static is patently mistaken. Off the top of my head, baseball has: outlawed the spitball, made batting helmets mandatory, and lowered the mound to alter the competitive balance between hitter and pitcher. Although this list clearly not exhaustive, two things about it are worth emphasis: 1. It includes rules changes for both safety and competition, and 2. It includes rules changes that most of us would agree were good (albeit, pitchers might not like any of them). So, beyond the fact that arguments from tradition are generally fallacious (sorry, I'm a philosophy teacher), in this particular instance it is simply empirically false that baseball always adheres to the status quo. If that's the only or best argument for maintaining the status quo, then to me it appears that position simply fails, which, of course, was Mr. Brisbee's point as well.