Article written by

Baseball writer... sort of.

7 comments
obsessivegiantscompulsive
obsessivegiantscompulsive

He's one of those classic prospects who don't have "stuff" and has to prove it at every level. He's made me a believer this season, though, because you don't strike out so many hitters without something about your pitches fooling pitches and that will carry upward as he rises, I believe. We've had a number who rise like this, such as Clayton Tanner, Kevin Pucetas, who rise up without great stuff, but they don't strikeout stuff like this at AA. He's still not an ace level starter to me yet, but this year convinces me that he'll probably make the majors in some capacity (hard to say with our rotation) and still has the potential to pitch well up here.

seeingwhatsticks
seeingwhatsticks

I'm still not totally convinced that a guy who tops out around 88mph can get MLB hitters out 3-4 times in a game, especially when he relies so much on K's, but it sounds to me like he'd be great in the pen. Have to think he'll be a strong candidate for a spot in 2012 if he gets to AAA in the second half of the year and has some success. A lefty Sergio Romo?

E-Nack
E-Nack

Nice piece with details. I think a lot of us get caught up in velocity because it makes it easy to compare and contrast pitchers. Plus there is the testosterone effect of my fastball's bigger than your fastball. I've always held the opinion that velocity is important only in that it reduces a hitter's reaction time. The difference in time from point of release (55 feet from the front of home plate approximately) to entry into the strike zone is about .395 seconds at 95 mph and .430 at 88 mph, about the bottom end of a MLB fastball these days. It doesn't seem like much but that 35/1000 of a second is all the additional time a major league hitter needs to square up on a pitch. But as your article so pointedly points out, Surkamp has an unusual release point not just from the slot but from a hiding the ball behind his ear so that, instead of the normal reaction time of .430 seconds on the typical 88 mph fastball that stands a good chance of being a bleacher seat souvenir, the hitter is getting something less than that. And if Surkamps k numbers are any indication, the reaction time is cut down quite a bit so he has the effective velocity of somebody maybe throwing in the mid to high 90s. Anyway, its something to watch and thanks for the update. Really nice job of digging up some facts on this guy and putting them in context with a nice perspective on his possible future with the Giants.

LeviDavis
LeviDavis

I will assume this was written just to please me. Why isn't Thomas Neal playing in Fresno? Also, Mike Kickham looking good over two starts in Augusta. Too early to make conclusions, but a deeper look at some point would be great. Thanks.

Rory Paap
Rory Paap

Someone had asked for a Surkamp update, but I couldn't remember who it was. That is why I wrote it. Not sure about Neal... assume it's an injury, though. The Giants have a lot of interesting prospects, even if their system isn't as deep as it was before Bum, Posey, etc. That's the way you'd prefer to deplete the system, though, successful graduation.

Mauro
Mauro

I had asked for a Surkamp update. Thank you for giving us one I sure hope he makes it. Mauro

LeviDavis
LeviDavis

I looked and Neal is on the 7-day DL. If anyone knows more about the injury, I would appreciate an update. Thanks.