Article written by

3 comments
daveinexile
daveinexile

A few days late and short but I’ll chime in any way. I would agree the Giants painted themselves into a corner on being able to move Lewis and get any return. As for the second point Lf has not always been the place to stick a guy with poor glove work or poor foot speed. Look back 20 years ago and the LF had BLB, Tim Raines and Ricky Henderson as the gold standard. The trend seems to come and go across the decades and is usually trumped but kind of talent a team has and the cane trade for. It is kind of like 3rd basemen over the years in that respect. I agree with Chris though that this has been a era where there are a lot of LF chosen despite there foot speed or glove work. And in this recent group Lewis has some large advantages in both foot speed and glove work. When compared to over the ages not so much.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

Hi camp! @1 ~ I'm not sure how we can gauge other team's interest in Fred. We really don't know what kind of desire their is for him behind the scenes. It's probably not huge, but I think the right team should recognize his value. He's not a starter on a contending team, but his success against RHP, baserunning, and D would make him a terrific 4th OF on a team that didn't totally suck at hitting baseballs. I would also wager that team's would rather wait out the Giants for Fred, hoping they cut him instead. @2 ~ We're starting to see a shift, I think, in who plays LF, but it's largely been the only other position on the baseball diamond (besides 1B) where teams stick their slow-footed position players. It's all about range, and Lewis outclasses your average LF in range. Largely because he's playing against guys like Carlos Lee, Garrett Anderson, and Jason Bay.

campanari
campanari

First, a question I have asked now and again on McC: if FL is a league-average player, why is there no interest in him from other teams with, if McC is to be credited, much smarter front offices who are more attuned to up-to-date stats? The Giants, it would seem, can hardly be demanding an enormous price for him; and certainly there are many teams who could use a league-average outfielder, as to hitting, running, and fielding. Shall we write off his minuscule market worth as pure aberration? Second, I have never understood why left fielders in particular should be "immobile." Since most batters are right-handed, one would think that most balls are hit to the left side of the field, hence that left fielders should get at least as many difficult plays as right fielders. The shorter throw to third base should mean that left fielders who can get to safely hit balls have the best chance of any outfielders to keep runners from going from first to third.