Article written by

7 comments
daveinexile
daveinexile

On a semi serious note I have been busy and missed the Duke move. (Yes, I understand I am losing internet fan status and risk getting demoted out of the basement. By the way that is my red line stapler.) But at this point I would be in favor a flier on Dukes for first base and some corner OF time. Move DeRosa to 2nd base with some 1st base time and the bulk of the corner Outfield time going to Bowker, Lewis and Nate for the first 3 months of the season. Yes, there is the potential for a some horrific badness in that recipe but there might just be 2-3 good things that could be counted on from say July 2010 through the 2011 season. It beats the snot out of Velez, DeRosa, Huff and one of Uribe or Fred Sanchez getting that play time.

marcello
marcello

For the record, babies are annoying, so count me as pro baby punching. And if the guy can play too, all the better.

hitnrun
hitnrun

Yes the Giants have a lot of outfielders now, but most of them carry defects. Velez can field, but needs to get on base and see more pitches. Lewis can get on base, but he has a hole in his glove. Bowker has yet to prove he can hit in the bigs, same with Nate,and Rowand is just overpaid. I would take a flyer on Dukes as long as he can hit and catch the ball, and keep the off field stuff under wraps, but I don't see Giants management doing anything, as Sabean and Bochy love to keep running out veterans on the downside of their careers, and Dukes is still young, but with an upside.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

>> Too bad he can’t hit. ...anything other than babies! This reminds me, I've always wondered how terrible athletes are behind the scenes? Like, the ones that appear to be nice. I've really got to read my copy of Ball Four soon.

delorean
delorean

I don't disagree with any of that. Also, I'm pretty sure Aaron Rowand is a convicted babypuncher. Too bad he can't hit.

Chris Quick
Chris Quick

I'm kinda with you, delorean. He does have some issues, but I think he's been relatively well behaved as of recent, no? Of course, something could have happened with the Nats, but they seem determined to not say what -- if anything happened at all. Any team that signs Dukes will have to weigh his off-the-field issues into the equation, they do exist. But, at this point I would take a known babypuncher as long as he could swing the bat and play a little defense. I don't expect athletes to be perfect, I just want them to help my team via production. Dukes can probably do that for the Giants.

delorean
delorean

I'm not one to scoff at a free league-average hitter, nor am I one who subscribes to the whole "clubhouse chemistry" myth. However, Dukes has proven himself to be something of a psycho, and I'm not sure I'd even be able to root for a guy like that (unless he gets some counseling and shows some contrition).