<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CHONE Projections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baycityball.com/2009/11/17/chone-projections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2009/11/17/chone-projections/</link>
	<description>Giants Baseball With a Side of STATS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 18:42:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulie R.</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2009/11/17/chone-projections/comment-page-1/#comment-4540</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulie R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 06:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/?p=5082#comment-4540</guid>
		<description>&gt;Mark me down as pro-Johnson. I don’t care how that sounds.&lt;

Better than being pro-Bocock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Mark me down as pro-Johnson. I don’t care how that sounds.&lt;</p>
<p>Better than being pro-Bocock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DProfessor</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2009/11/17/chone-projections/comment-page-1/#comment-4539</link>
		<dc:creator>DProfessor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/?p=5082#comment-4539</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not big on projections, but they are a useful tool when evaluating the relative worth of one player to the next.

Like you, Chris, I find the Nick Johnson and Ryan Garko numbers interesting.  Both productive and both could thrive in a 1B platoon.

Since it is obvious the Giants are (thankfully) not going to resign their only three FAs they wanted back--Molina, Penny, and Uribe--then they ought to pursue Johnson and seriously entertain the possibility of Holliday.

Nick Johnson would be a definite upgrade over Travis Ishikawa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not big on projections, but they are a useful tool when evaluating the relative worth of one player to the next.</p>
<p>Like you, Chris, I find the Nick Johnson and Ryan Garko numbers interesting.  Both productive and both could thrive in a 1B platoon.</p>
<p>Since it is obvious the Giants are (thankfully) not going to resign their only three FAs they wanted back&#8211;Molina, Penny, and Uribe&#8211;then they ought to pursue Johnson and seriously entertain the possibility of Holliday.</p>
<p>Nick Johnson would be a definite upgrade over Travis Ishikawa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADoc1980</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2009/11/17/chone-projections/comment-page-1/#comment-4538</link>
		<dc:creator>ADoc1980</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/?p=5082#comment-4538</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d take Marlon Byrd over Cameron, if only because of age.  But a free agent class of Byrd, Johnson and Zaun would make this Giants fan quite happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d take Marlon Byrd over Cameron, if only because of age.  But a free agent class of Byrd, Johnson and Zaun would make this Giants fan quite happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.325 seconds -->
