Article written by

4 comments
obsessivegiantscompu
obsessivegiantscompu

It is not foolish to think the Giants cannot repeat 2009 great pitching performance in 2010. That is because it is foolish to think that the 2010 team has anything to do with the teams since 1954 that could not achieve such a level of excellence. Meanwhile, the 2010 team has everything to do with the 2009 team that did achieve it. The Giants never had a combination like Lincecum and Cain, nor then follow that up with Sanchez and Zito. I think that a proper comparison is with the Dodgers of the 60's. In 1960, they had the best ERA in the league. Here is their ranks over the next decade: 1960: 1st 1961: 6th 1962: 3rd 1963: 1st 1964: 1st 1965: 1st 1966: 1st 1967: 5th 1968: 2nd 1969: 3rd Top 3 in 8 of 10 years, 1st in 5 years. That is a more apt comparison with the Giants rotation of today. Now, I wouldn't bet on the Giants doing it again in 2010, because you never know about injuries or down performances, but what they did in 2009 is the pitchers' talent level, give or take. And it could get better in 2010 if Sanchez and/or Zito can do it for a full season, or at least counterbalance should Lincecum or Cain regress to the mean, resulting in a repeat performance or roughly so. And if Penny is willing to sign with us for 2010, then that would make it even more likely for 2010 to be better than 2009, because Johnson didn't actually pitch that well for us, and then Sadowski and Martinez were even worse. So I think that there is a good chance that the team repeats, plus should there be any injury, I think that Bumgarner would be able to come up and do almost as well as whoever we lose. It is most definitely not foolish to think that the 2009 season could repeat in 2010.

Chris
Chris

Thanks delorean. I'm not sure how she does it. Marquis Grissom is immortal!

delorean
delorean

1. congrats on finding a woman to put up with you b. i sat here for a good 60 seconds trying to figure out how Marquis Grissom pitched for the '54 Giants