Sitting in the shadow of the Appalachian Mountains this weekend a fleeting thought struck me. I wonder how the Giants are doing right now? It was a brief, inconsequential thought about the team as they played their last few days of regular season baseball. Over the past weekend I celebrated my first wedding anniversary with my lovely wife in a small cottage in Virginia minutes away from Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello. We toured the historic house that Jefferson built and it was an amazing experience. I’m a sucker for presidential history and Monticello was as beautiful as I had hoped. The house is absolutely stuffed with history, invention, and Jefferson’s own twist on what it meant to be human.
It was great.
After we toured Monitcello, found some dinner in Charlottesville, and came back to our small cottage, I turned on the Giants game just in time to see Pablo Sandoval sock a home run all the way across the country in San Diego. Modern technology is amazing. Sandoval’s blast sailed past the CF wall and just like that the season was gone. It’s fitting that the Giants won their final game of the year on a Sandoval HR. No other player stepped up on the offense like Sandoval did in ‘09.
The Giants best three hitters from this past season ranked by wOBA:
Sandoval (.396)
Uribe (.351)
Lewis (.327)
Sandoval was by far the best hitter on this horrible hitting team. Past Sandoval, you’ll find Juan Uribe’s surprising season and Fred Lewis — who by July and August was chained to the bench. I found that when Sandoval’s ball left the park and the Giants closed things out in the bottom of the 10th inning, I was already missing baseball. The one thing I won’t miss was the offense. For all the fun and joy this 88-win team brought us, the offense made this team darned hard to watch. There’s more to baseball than just offense and it’s true that the Giants excelled in all things not-hitting in ‘09. Their team ERA+ of 120 is probably the best cumulative pitching effort that we’ll see for quite awhile. The last time a Giants team ERA+ cracked 120?
Try the 1954 New York Giants with an team ERA+ of 132. Check out this list of some of the top ERA+ scores and IP totals for that team. An * denotes that the pitcher was left-handed.
| Name | IP | ERA+ |
| Hoyt Wilhelm | 111.1 | 194 |
| Johnny Antonelli* | 258.2 | 177 |
| Marv Grissom | 122.1 | 173 |
| Ruben Gomez | 221.2 | 141 |
| Don Liddle* | 126.2 | 133 |
| Sal Maglie | 218.1 | 125 |
| Name | IP | ERA+ |
| Hoyt Wilhelm | 111.1 | 194 |
| Johnny Antonelli* | 258.2 | 177 |
| Marv Grissom | 122.1 | 173 |
| Ruben Gomez | 221.2 | 141 |
| Don Liddle* | 126.2 | 133 |
| Sal Maglie | 218.1 | 125 |
To have such a prolific year on the mound you need skill, health, and a good bit of luck. Take for example Ruben Gomez. In ‘54 the 26-year-old right-hander threw 221.2 innings of 141 ERA+ baseball despite leading the league in walks with 109. He would go on to win Game 3 of the 1954 World Series and he would never have the same level of success again in his big league career. Only once more would he break a ERA+ score of 100. To expect the Giants’ rotation to have the same level of success in 2010 as they had in 2009 is foolish. What we saw from the mound this year was the best pitching performance since the team moved to San Francisco 51 years ago.
Wrap your head around that for a second. What we saw this year only happens 2-3 times per 50 years. The Giants probably won’t have the same luxury of pitching next season as they had in this one. The pitching should be good, but I’m not sure it’s going to be 120 ERA+ good.
In short, the 2009 Giants are dead. Long live the 2009 Giants! I’m already counting down the days until pitchers and catchers report to Spring Training. Thanks for all those that have emailed me, posted on this site, and shared their collective frustration (and occasional joy) on the Giants. It’s been a wild year and I’m thankful that you’ve joined me on this ride we call being a fan.
1. congrats on finding a woman to put up with you
b. i sat here for a good 60 seconds trying to figure out how Marquis Grissom pitched for the ‘54 Giants
Thanks delorean. I’m not sure how she does it.
Marquis Grissom is immortal!
It is not foolish to think the Giants cannot repeat 2009 great pitching performance in 2010.
That is because it is foolish to think that the 2010 team has anything to do with the teams since 1954 that could not achieve such a level of excellence. Meanwhile, the 2010 team has everything to do with the 2009 team that did achieve it. The Giants never had a combination like Lincecum and Cain, nor then follow that up with Sanchez and Zito.
I think that a proper comparison is with the Dodgers of the 60’s. In 1960, they had the best ERA in the league. Here is their ranks over the next decade:
1960: 1st
1961: 6th
1962: 3rd
1963: 1st
1964: 1st
1965: 1st
1966: 1st
1967: 5th
1968: 2nd
1969: 3rd
Top 3 in 8 of 10 years, 1st in 5 years. That is a more apt comparison with the Giants rotation of today.
Now, I wouldn’t bet on the Giants doing it again in 2010, because you never know about injuries or down performances, but what they did in 2009 is the pitchers’ talent level, give or take. And it could get better in 2010 if Sanchez and/or Zito can do it for a full season, or at least counterbalance should Lincecum or Cain regress to the mean, resulting in a repeat performance or roughly so.
And if Penny is willing to sign with us for 2010, then that would make it even more likely for 2010 to be better than 2009, because Johnson didn’t actually pitch that well for us, and then Sadowski and Martinez were even worse.
So I think that there is a good chance that the team repeats, plus should there be any injury, I think that Bumgarner would be able to come up and do almost as well as whoever we lose. It is most definitely not foolish to think that the 2009 season could repeat in 2010.
Nah.