4 responses to “Sanchez Grindy; Talking More Draftees”

  1. marcello

    I agree with you on drafting relievers, but I don’t mind the Stoffel selection. It’s only a fourth round pick and he has some interesting upside.

  2. marcello

    Yup, first round relievers are unforgivable. Probably 2nd round too, but it gets sort of gray for me after that.

  3. Giantsfan4life

    Toole’s motion didn’t seem that violent to me, but the game i watched, he wasn’t throwing mid-nineties either, so maybe he was hurtin’. He also got clobbered. But it looks to me like we got a couple kids like that: Matthew Graham, for example; huge stuff, screwed up mechanics. Absolutely worth taking a chance on. More than Stoffel, I think I like the Dominguz pick, one that hasn’t really gotten as much attention. Led the Cape Cod league in HR, so we know he can swing the wooden bat.

    Y’all see Ray Ratto’s column? http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/06/13/SP22186VVH.DTL

    His main point seems right to me: we are, actually, sort of improbably, in it. But I also think we’re poised to build a genuinely excellent, year-after-year contending team by 2011, and also capable of screwing that up if we make seriously wrong moves right now. And I rather suspect Brian Sabean, and more important, William Neukom knows that. So, no, we don’t trade Jonathan Sanchez for Mark DeRosa. What makes sense to me would some far more modest moves: like maybe seeing if Fred Lewis can recover his stroke in Fresno, if Nate Schierholtz can be an everyday RF, and if John Bowker can fill Schierholtz’ 4th OF role. (Or just put Bowker in left. Or a platoon of Bowker and Horwitz. Or Bowker and Torres.) Or see if Jesus Guzman has figured out how to play 1b yet. Or see just how much coaxing it would take to persuade Rich Aurelia to join our coaching staff.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.