3 responses to “Replacing Sergio Romo”

  1. daveinexile

    I can’t fault your logic or your rankings. The Hennessy comparison I think is spot on. Medders is the safety net for this bunch.

    I think Yabu will get a look, if he wants it, from someone. No, they will not trade much more than an old ham sandwich for him but he did have a decent season last year and a lot of teams have middle relief issues every year and not all of them are cellar dwellers though they would make the bulk of his market.

  2. MrLomez

    Good stuff, as usual. I’d also tab Miller for this role – certainly over Sadler, who is one of my least favorite Giants.

    I do have one quibble though. I think your criteria is a little off. Yes, this person is nominally replacing Romo, but I don’t think whoever is ultimately chosen for the last bullpen spot will replace Romo situationally.

    This person will essentially be “the worst” of the team’s relievers and will therefore be relegated to the “least leveraged” situations. In effect, Taschner or Hinshaw – or whoever performs best in ST – will be the person who “replaces” Romo, no?

    If that’s the case, isn’t the pitcher’s “stuff” secondary, or at least supplemental, to his ability to eat innings. Obviously those two things generally go hand in hand, but there are certain pitchers who can just pitch and pitch and pitch and still be available to pitch tomorrow. Isn’t that the guy we want taking that final bullpen slot? The guy who can come in and finish off a Barry Zito 4 and a third IP, 6 run, stinker?

    I’d want a guy who could come in and just throw strikes for 3 innings. Sadler is DEFINITELY not that guy. Miller has the best BB/9 of them all, which is why I’d go that direction.

    You get what I mean here?

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.