Article written by

2 comments
marcello
marcello

Interestingly (and surprisingly, since I would have figured the same as you did), over the last four years he actually saw more fastballs in the AL than in the NL: http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=117... My guess is the difference in his AL and NL stats mostly come from two things: 1) Difference in quality of opposition. The AL is a better league, so Renteria was facing better pitching. 2) Some bad luck. I too agree that this is a good signing, and I look forward to the post where his fielding is examined since Renteria seems to get unfairly criticized for his defense.

MrLomez
MrLomez

My gut reaction to this deal back in December was that the Giants did well, if not spectacular, for themselves in filling the vacuum at SS. Not to self-promote, but I wrote about as much here. I was then surprised at how the deal was subsequently lambasted by most Giants commentators. Anyway, glad to hear someone else shares my tempered enthusiasm for Renteria. Quick question/topic of interest: It's often said about Renteria that he performs at a much higher clip in the NL. Most recently, his stints with Cardinals and Braves were markedly better than his stints with the Sox and Tigers. Presumptively, this has to do with NL pitching - i.e. he sees more fastballs - and also a certain comfort level in NL parks. In general, is there any truth to the notion that A) Guys can perform measurably better in one league rather than another? B) NL pitching habits are different than AL pitching habits? Lastly, if Renteria in fact did see significantly more fastballs during 2007 (Braves), could that account for his higher BABIP? Which then leads us to the question of whether or not we can expect Renteria to return to that 2007 level of production in '09. Assuming NL pitchers do throw more fastballs, I would say yes. We should expect a version of Renteria closer to his 2007 year than his 2008 year.