<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cain&#8217;s Second Half Start</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baycityball.com/2008/08/05/cains-second-half-start/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2008/08/05/cains-second-half-start/</link>
	<description>Giants Baseball With a Side of STATS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 12:55:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2008/08/05/cains-second-half-start/comment-page-1/#comment-3610</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/?p=581#comment-3610</guid>
		<description>Hi Cat,

Welcome to the blog, good to see you commenting, I enjoy FRJ. 

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Would there be any reason to believe that Steve Holm has anything to do Cain mixing up his pitches and/or his recent success? Cain pitches better when Holm catches (.219/.303/.344 against) than when Molina catches (.240/.315/.390 against), but the sample sizes are so small that the numbers probably don’t mean much.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;

You pretty much answered my answer (does that sound right?) with the last sentence in your paragraph about sample sizes. It&#039;s such a small sample size that I don&#039;t think you can determine anything from the 4 games that Holm caught for Cain, other than Cain has pitched well. The question of whether or not Holm has any future ability to make Cain pitch better isn&#039;t likely, in my opinion.

Studies have shown that catchers with the label of &quot;pitchers catchers&quot; -- like Mike Matheny used to have -- really don&#039;t matter much. After all, if Matheny, or Holm in this case, had any power to make pitchers better, it should be apparent for all pitchers. That is, seeing a noticeable difference in pitchers when they work with a &quot;pitchers catcher&quot; and when they work with a &quot;non-pitchers catcher&quot;. Studies have shown that it&#039;s random. One year a pitcher will pitch great to a PC (pitchers catcher) and the next year, he won&#039;t. One year he&#039;ll throw really well with a NPC (non-pitcher catcher) and the next year he won&#039;t. 

Game calling isn&#039;t a skill that&#039;s been proven in any study, not to say that it doesn&#039;t exist but if it does, it&#039;s so small that it&#039;s undetectable. Catchers help their pitchers the most by doing tangible things, ie: catching the ball, throwing out baserunners, etc. 

Now, you could use PFX data and see if Molina calls a game a certain way, which he very well might. But I&#039;m not sure how much it matters in the long run of how a catcher calls a game. My reasoning is that Molina isn&#039;t going to have Cain throwing his 4th best pitcher 70% of the time in a game. Catchers will call the pitches that pitchers throw the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Cat,</p>
<p>Welcome to the blog, good to see you commenting, I enjoy FRJ. </p>
<blockquote><p><cite>Would there be any reason to believe that Steve Holm has anything to do Cain mixing up his pitches and/or his recent success? Cain pitches better when Holm catches (.219/.303/.344 against) than when Molina catches (.240/.315/.390 against), but the sample sizes are so small that the numbers probably don’t mean much.</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>You pretty much answered my answer (does that sound right?) with the last sentence in your paragraph about sample sizes. It&#8217;s such a small sample size that I don&#8217;t think you can determine anything from the 4 games that Holm caught for Cain, other than Cain has pitched well. The question of whether or not Holm has any future ability to make Cain pitch better isn&#8217;t likely, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Studies have shown that catchers with the label of &#8220;pitchers catchers&#8221; &#8212; like Mike Matheny used to have &#8212; really don&#8217;t matter much. After all, if Matheny, or Holm in this case, had any power to make pitchers better, it should be apparent for all pitchers. That is, seeing a noticeable difference in pitchers when they work with a &#8220;pitchers catcher&#8221; and when they work with a &#8220;non-pitchers catcher&#8221;. Studies have shown that it&#8217;s random. One year a pitcher will pitch great to a PC (pitchers catcher) and the next year, he won&#8217;t. One year he&#8217;ll throw really well with a NPC (non-pitcher catcher) and the next year he won&#8217;t. </p>
<p>Game calling isn&#8217;t a skill that&#8217;s been proven in any study, not to say that it doesn&#8217;t exist but if it does, it&#8217;s so small that it&#8217;s undetectable. Catchers help their pitchers the most by doing tangible things, ie: catching the ball, throwing out baserunners, etc. </p>
<p>Now, you could use PFX data and see if Molina calls a game a certain way, which he very well might. But I&#8217;m not sure how much it matters in the long run of how a catcher calls a game. My reasoning is that Molina isn&#8217;t going to have Cain throwing his 4th best pitcher 70% of the time in a game. Catchers will call the pitches that pitchers throw the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2008/08/05/cains-second-half-start/comment-page-1/#comment-3609</link>
		<dc:creator>Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/?p=581#comment-3609</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,

First time poster, but I&#039;ve been reading your blog for a while and I love your work. 

Would there be any reason to believe that Steve Holm has anything to do Cain mixing up his pitches and/or his recent success? Cain pitches better when Holm catches (.219/.303/.344 against) than when Molina catches (.240/.315/.390 against), but the sample sizes are so small that the numbers probably don&#039;t mean much.

Molina has done a good job with the pitchers. The only problem I&#039;ve noticed is that he sometimes tends to call for one pitch too often until the pitcher gets beaten up. Whereas Molina will stay with a pitch, Holm seems cognizant of what pitches work for the pitcher that game, and mix it up from there. 

The percentages from Fangraphs suggest that Cain&#039;s incorporation of his other pitches to reduce his reliance on the fastball has been his goal for a while and not just because of Holm&#039;s catching style. I guess that we see Cain&#039;s improvement when Holm catches because Holm&#039;s style is geared to highlight such improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,</p>
<p>First time poster, but I&#8217;ve been reading your blog for a while and I love your work. </p>
<p>Would there be any reason to believe that Steve Holm has anything to do Cain mixing up his pitches and/or his recent success? Cain pitches better when Holm catches (.219/.303/.344 against) than when Molina catches (.240/.315/.390 against), but the sample sizes are so small that the numbers probably don&#8217;t mean much.</p>
<p>Molina has done a good job with the pitchers. The only problem I&#8217;ve noticed is that he sometimes tends to call for one pitch too often until the pitcher gets beaten up. Whereas Molina will stay with a pitch, Holm seems cognizant of what pitches work for the pitcher that game, and mix it up from there. </p>
<p>The percentages from Fangraphs suggest that Cain&#8217;s incorporation of his other pitches to reduce his reliance on the fastball has been his goal for a while and not just because of Holm&#8217;s catching style. I guess that we see Cain&#8217;s improvement when Holm catches because Holm&#8217;s style is geared to highlight such improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2008/08/05/cains-second-half-start/comment-page-1/#comment-3607</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/?p=581#comment-3607</guid>
		<description>Hey delorean,

Thanks for the first hand account, watching Cain do well in starts like his last against Atlanta is one of the few bright spots in this season. I think people tend to forget how young he his and the fact that he&#039;s putting up 120-ish ERA+ seasons in his age 22 and 23 years is a good sign.

Haha, thanks for the Miller anecdote. I love Jon but the CLOSERS role in baseball is one of the weirdest things ever. The new Jim Caple article on ESPN is a decent look at the absurdness of the save stat and closer usage. 

Did you hear Miller pronounces OPS (oh pee es) on Sunday Night baseball a month or so ago? He called it &quot;OPS&quot; like &quot;Special OPS&quot;. It was pretty funny and I think FJM riffed on it. 

Thanks for the thought, I&#039;m glad my SABR ramblings has at least made a few people think about baseball differently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey delorean,</p>
<p>Thanks for the first hand account, watching Cain do well in starts like his last against Atlanta is one of the few bright spots in this season. I think people tend to forget how young he his and the fact that he&#8217;s putting up 120-ish ERA+ seasons in his age 22 and 23 years is a good sign.</p>
<p>Haha, thanks for the Miller anecdote. I love Jon but the CLOSERS role in baseball is one of the weirdest things ever. The new Jim Caple article on ESPN is a decent look at the absurdness of the save stat and closer usage. </p>
<p>Did you hear Miller pronounces OPS (oh pee es) on Sunday Night baseball a month or so ago? He called it &#8220;OPS&#8221; like &#8220;Special OPS&#8221;. It was pretty funny and I think FJM riffed on it. </p>
<p>Thanks for the thought, I&#8217;m glad my SABR ramblings has at least made a few people think about baseball differently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delorean</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2008/08/05/cains-second-half-start/comment-page-1/#comment-3603</link>
		<dc:creator>delorean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/?p=581#comment-3603</guid>
		<description>Great info Chris, thanks! 

We were at the game last night, and Matt really looked out of sorts in the first coupla innings. His control looked rough, and he wasn&#039;t able to spot his off-speed stuff at all. He was out there with only the fastball, and he wasn&#039;t even spotting that very well. (Again, this is only in the first inning or two.)

His growth as a pitcher really showed in how he fought through his early wildness to spot his off-speed pitches his second time through the order. (Hey, maybe this was all by design? Maybe...) Anyway, once he got in the groove, weren&#039;t no one gonna get him out of it. He even hit 95 once on the stadium gun late in the game! What a great outing. 

Oh, also, in the wrap, Jon Miller was talking about SABR guys and their disdain for Brian Wilson and his peripherals. &quot;These SABR types must not be watching the games,&quot; he said, &quot;because Wilson is getting the job done!&quot; (Way to totally miss the point, Jon. I still love you, though.) 

Anyway, that little aside made me think of you, Doc. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great info Chris, thanks! </p>
<p>We were at the game last night, and Matt really looked out of sorts in the first coupla innings. His control looked rough, and he wasn&#8217;t able to spot his off-speed stuff at all. He was out there with only the fastball, and he wasn&#8217;t even spotting that very well. (Again, this is only in the first inning or two.)</p>
<p>His growth as a pitcher really showed in how he fought through his early wildness to spot his off-speed pitches his second time through the order. (Hey, maybe this was all by design? Maybe&#8230;) Anyway, once he got in the groove, weren&#8217;t no one gonna get him out of it. He even hit 95 once on the stadium gun late in the game! What a great outing. </p>
<p>Oh, also, in the wrap, Jon Miller was talking about SABR guys and their disdain for Brian Wilson and his peripherals. &#8220;These SABR types must not be watching the games,&#8221; he said, &#8220;because Wilson is getting the job done!&#8221; (Way to totally miss the point, Jon. I still love you, though.) </p>
<p>Anyway, that little aside made me think of you, Doc. <img src='http://www.baycityball.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.450 seconds -->
