Article written by

2 comments
baetown415
baetown415

You forgot to mention Towers' pickup of Milton Bradley during midseason 2007. Had Bradley not gotten injured toward the end of the season, the Padres would've had a better chance to get to the post season (granted, Matt Holliday didn't touch home).

Frank
Frank

I don't know that anyone can really state, with any clear certainty, what Sabean's plan or strategy is. And it is, admittedly, frustrating to not know. To me it is kind of a confusing mess. On the one hand, they do have and, evidently, plan on playing some young players (Velez, Davis, Lewis). But, on the other hand, they still have, counbting Rowand, 7 position players who are not going to be part of the next Giants contender. I think we are all frustrated by that. We don't know if Sabean is pleased or frustrated by that. But I don't think Huber proves your point. And I don't think it is as easy as you presume to bring in other team's rejects - this is because there are 40 man and 25 man decisions that are implicated every time some other player is brought in. I would like to think Sabean has identified certain 'targets' on other teams, guys he would bring in. And, if this were true, he'd have looked at Huber and concluded he didn't have enough upside to bring in and, potentially, have to cut someone else. When I watch Fred Lewis, or Frandsen, or even Bocock in the field, I can see why he wouldn't want to bring up a team of Huber's and Lewis' - Jesus, that would be like last night's game against the Mariners, a game with all the technical expertise of Little League. It seems to me there are LOTS of flawed prospects out there. I think Sabean is smart not to try to corner the market on them. On the other hand, it would be nice if we had one or two bona fide prospects, guys who were expected, if they developed, to become top 25% players at their position. Since we don't, I'm not really sure super long shots is the way to go.