<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Ray Durham A Good Giant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baycityball.com/2007/08/27/was-ray-durham-a-good-giant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2007/08/27/was-ray-durham-a-good-giant/</link>
	<description>Giants Baseball With a Side of STATS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:21:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bay City Ball &#124; A San Francisco Giants Blog &#187; Just Say No To No-Trade</title>
		<link>http://www.baycityball.com/2007/08/27/was-ray-durham-a-good-giant/comment-page-1/#comment-2291</link>
		<dc:creator>Bay City Ball &#124; A San Francisco Giants Blog &#187; Just Say No To No-Trade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baycityball.com/2007/08/27/was-ray-durham-a-good-giant/#comment-2291</guid>
		<description>[...] of .360. Durham hit for power in 2004 and 2006, posting an ISO over .200 in each of those years. Being moved out of the leadoff spot could have prompted Ray to swing for the fences more and try to focus more on his power game. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of .360. Durham hit for power in 2004 and 2006, posting an ISO over .200 in each of those years. Being moved out of the leadoff spot could have prompted Ray to swing for the fences more and try to focus more on his power game. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.280 seconds -->
